In an effort to build a case for realistic hindsight, it’s high time to research the post- (if not pre-) 9/11 paths of current, former (and future?) Guantanamo Bay detainees in the “War on Terror.”
The AP sets an intriguing foundation for research/interrogation into the what/why with this report regarding the status of the 360 or so men released from detention since the January 2002 opening of Camp X-Ray @ Gitmo:
Once the detainees arrived in other countries, 205 of the 245 were either freed without being charged or were cleared of charges related to their detention at Guantanamo. Forty either stand charged with crimes or continue to be detained.
The WaPo’s A01 leads with compelling CIA testimony revealing some details of the spiriting away of alleged miscreants known as (my fave term of this young century) “extraordinary rendition.”
The June 2006 wiretapped exchange between two Italian secret agents uncovers plans to hand over suspects, including Abu Omar to the Americans. Unfortunate to read, but remarks from U.S. diplomats — namely John B. Bellinger, a legal adviser to Sec. State Rice, show a backwards recognition of circumstances, complete with denial and the notion that the U.S. still retains it’s powers of intimidation, etc:
“On the negative side of the ledger, we do continue to have these hysterical, inflated allegations denouncing the United States that unfortunately do fan the flames of suspicion and anti-Americanism.”
A series of question marks pop up — the road to mapping out this world-spanning web of alleged terror-management is taking shape. As active duty soldiers themselves begin taking a stand against the Long War , the U.S. government still contends it’s in a position to muzzle any and all dissent in the name of national security (whatever that is).
As the big ugly picture becomes clearer, hopefully logic, remorse and reality will take some effect — as the WaPo also reports today, Canadian citizen Maher Arar, who was illegally deported by America and tortured in Syria remains on the U.S. “watch list.” All this in spite of the Canadian government’s $16 million judicial probe into Arar’s torture case His lawyers are asking that Ottawa compensate him $37 million (CDN dollars, I assume) for Canada’s cooperation with the U.S. in handing him over.
How pulselessly innocent must one be to not be presumed guilty? Will the Supreme Court find it’s own pulse? (see Hamdan / 2006 MCA)