ONE roadside bomb killed ten marines and wounded eleven others, some seriously, as they entered a neighborhood outside Fallujah on “foot patrol,” according to the Pentagon. It was one of the single deadliest attacks on U.S. forces in Iraq (see Reuters’ chronology of deadliest attacks).
“Where were the damn Iraqi troops accompanying our Marines?” asks Larry Johnson in Booman Tribune, refering to the “ambush.”
The U.S. admitted to paying off editors to publish articles written by U.S. troops and passing them off as unbiased accounts in Iraqi newspapers. BIG DEAL, is all I can think, as this represents one of the most traditional strategies in American military (and business) culture — IO (Informational Operations). You want bad propaganda? Just ask Arnold – corrupting his constituency with the help of fake VNR’s.
Iraq Dispatches blog criticizes the medias continuous references to cities like Fallujah as being “pacified,” only to be followed by reports of elaborately planned attacks such as this one
Its not so much the propaganda on the ground that is to blame, as it is the “presstitutes talking on the radio from their hotel rooms in Baghdad,” blogs Dahr Jamail.
Blackfive agrees that the exaggerated reporting of Reuters and other international journalists works best for the propaganda of the enemy. He references the hundred of armed men reported to have been controlling the streets of Ramadi yesterday, claiming there were only about a dozen, “all with a look of ‘Are you getting this?’ to the
collaborator journalist filming them.”
Not sure how this coincides with the “shocking” reports of Iraqi journalists are being “paid-off” to print positive spin in their newspapers (as opposed to death threats they would receive for not attending to the insurgents/ELIGs/Saddaammists side)? … but consider this mass e-mail to news organizations from Capt. Jeffrey Pool, a spokesman for the 2nd Marine Division:
“Today I witnessed inaccurate reporting, use of unreliable sources, media using other media as sources, an active insurgent propaganda machine, and the pack journalism at its worse”
Lynch did not answer directly but quoted a senior al-Qaida leader, Ayman al-Zawahiri, as having told Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the main terrorist leader in Iraq, “Remember, half the battle is the battlefield of the media.” Lynch said Zarqawi lies to the Iraqi people and he said that the American military does not.
Zogby is soon to release a poll surveying the opinions of residents of the Middle-East and their opinions on the United States’ ambition to spread democracy. Robin Wright previewed the following results in the Washington Post:
—77 percent of those surveyed in six countries — Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, all U.S. allies — say Iraqis are worse off than before the war began in 2003.
— 58 percent believe the U.S. intervention has produced less democracy in the region,
— Almost 70 percent said they do not believe democracy was the real U.S. goal in toppling Saddam Hussein.
This poll has yet to be released, as promised in the Post article.
So, how exactly does our not-as-the-Constitution defined administration maintaining democracy?
“you can’t allow somebody to commit the crime before you detain them. Because if they commit the crime, thousands of innocent people die.”
With three years of utter disbelief to go, Smith interprets:
“Were we not committed to democracy, we could have applied her principle to the Bush Cabinet in January, 2001, before they committed their crimes. Many innocents who have died would still be alive.
Retired Lt. Gen. William Odom told NPR this morning that by staying in Iraq, U.S. troop are only assisting al-Qaeda and other Islamic extremists. Listen here, or watch him reiterate his sentiments that leaving Iraq is the ONLY way to begin stabilizing the Middle East on CNN (h/t: Daily Dissent)